1 1 2 Proof Principia Mathematica
The table below gives a proof of 1 1 2 based on the proof system described in formal proofs of arithmetic.
1 1 2 proof principia mathematica. Ask question asked 6 years 5 months ago. First mathematical proof class in college sophomore year. Here s my best attempt at typesetting the proof that 1 1 2 in principia mathematica. Use the first part of the definition of with a b 1.
Viewed 2k times 17. 1 1 2. Typesetting famous 54 43 proof 1 1 2 in principia mathematica. The work of g.
This is quite easy and hav. Abresas3 19 pm july 25 2011. Some idea of the scope and comprehensiveness of the principia can be gleaned from the fact that it takes over 360 pages to prove definitively that 1 1 2. In it they laid the foundation of modern mathematics.
Since 1 and 2 don t occur as basic symbols of that system we need to define them as 0 and 0 so the statement to be proved is 0 0 0. People say that they needed 300 pages to prove it because in page 379 it says from this proposition it will follow when arithmetical addition has been defined that 1 1 2 volume i 1st edition page 379 page 362 in 2nd edition. Page 360 in abridged version. A small part of the long proof that 1 1 2 in the principia mathematica.
Remember that proofs in this sense are just about manipulating symbols. I remember this too clearly as it took me 5 hours to figure but once i did it was all too easy. The last page of russel and whitehead s proof that 1 1 2. Here on page 362 they finally get around to proving that 1 1 2.
If b 0 then define a b a. Peano shows that it s not hard to produce a useful set of axioms that can prove 1 1 2 much more easily than whitehead and russell do. The main reason that it takes so long to get to 1 1 2 is that principia mathematica starts from almost nothing and works its way up in very tiny incremental steps. Finally i have found online a copy of the magnificent culmination of the 20th century s most ambitious work of mathematics.
Active 6 years 5 months ago. Somewhat infamously several hundred pages of pm precede the proof of the validity of the proposition 1 1 2. Then 1 1 1 2 q e d. Then you have to change the definition of addition to this.
Principia mathematica alfred north whitehead and bertrand russell wrote principia mathematica and published it in three volumes in the years 1910 1913. Contemporary mathematicians tend to use a modernized form of the system of zermelo fraenkel set theory.